120+ countries / 170+ routes

Global servers and route selection

The route table is organized by region, city, and access method to clarify egress locations and network structure. When choosing a route, start with the region where the target service is located, then test options against your current network. This is more reliable than simply choosing the geographically closest location.

  • No device limit
  • 7-day, no-questions-asked refund
  • No email address required
REGION DIRECTORY

Regional routes directory

The list below shows representative regions and access methods to provide a clear starting range in the client. ZVVPN covers 120+ countries / 170+ routes overall; the table does not list every route or substitute fixed speed-test results for testing on your current network.

Country / region City Route type Streaming
Asia-Pacific
Japan Tokyo IEPL dedicated line Supported
Japan Osaka Relay Supported
Singapore Singapore IEPL dedicated line Supported
Hong Kong, China Hong Kong Relay Choose by region
South Korea Seoul Direct Choose by region
Australia Sydney Relay Supported
North America
United States Los Angeles IEPL dedicated line Supported
United States San Jose Relay Supported
United States Seattle Direct Choose by region
United States New York Relay Supported
Canada Vancouver Direct Choose by region
Canada Toronto Relay Supported
Europe
United Kingdom London IEPL dedicated line Supported
France Paris Relay Supported
Germany Frankfurt Relay Choose by region
Netherlands Amsterdam Direct Choose by region
Switzerland Zurich Direct Choose by region
Italy Milan Relay Supported
Other regions
United Arab Emirates Dubai Relay Choose by region
India Mumbai Direct Choose by region
Brazil São Paulo Relay Supported
South Africa Johannesburg Direct Choose by region
Türkiye Istanbul Relay Supported
New Zealand Auckland Direct Choose by region
ROUTE STRUCTURE

Route types explained

IEPL dedicated lines, relay routes, and direct routes describe different network structures, not a simple speed ranking. The access network, egress location, carrier interconnection, and target service region all affect the final experience.

A

IEPL dedicated line

Link priority

An IEPL dedicated line uses a more clearly defined cross-border path between the entry and egress points, reducing uncontrollable detours on the public internet. It is better suited to tasks sensitive to sustained transfers, long sessions, and evening network fluctuations, such as ongoing work, remote collaboration, large-file syncing, or extended streaming.

These routes typically require more resources and maintenance than ordinary direct routes, so they are best prioritized for important tasks rather than used for all traffic at all times. If the target service is far away, choose an egress region close to that service instead of relying only on the route name.

B

Relay route

Path balance

A relay route sends the connection to a suitable entry point first, then forwards it through an intermediate link to the target egress. Its value lies in improving an otherwise poor public-network path and making the connection between the access carrier and international egress more predictable. For everyday browsing, streaming, and common online tools, relay routes often balance coverage and connection stability.

A relay is not inherently better than every direct route, and more hops do not automatically mean a better connection. A well-designed relay should reduce unnecessary detours and give the entry and egress points clear roles. When choosing one, assess page loading, video buffering, file transfers, and session persistence instead of judging from a single brief test.

C

Direct route

Simpler path

A direct route connects the current network straight to the target egress, with a simpler path structure. It suits situations where interconnection between the local network and the target region is good. For ordinary web pages, document transfers, short searches, or a specific egress country, start by testing a nearby direct route.

Direct routes depend more heavily on the local carrier’s international interconnection quality, so results can vary significantly between networks. A direct route that appears closer by name may still be less stable than a relay because of actual routing detours. Direct routes are therefore useful for lightweight tasks and comparison tests; if persistent instability appears, switch to a relay or IEPL dedicated line in the same region.

USE CASES

Choose international routes by use case

A reliable route-selection method starts with the target service, not the server name. The right criteria differ for browsing, video, AI Tools, gaming, and work.

01

Everyday browsing

When browsing international websites, prioritize nearby Asia-Pacific routes that load pages smoothly. Focus not on a momentary peak but on whether multiple pages open consistently and images and scripts load completely. If a direct egress works well on your network, it is usually sufficient; if pages pause intermittently, switch to a relay route in the same region.

Near first, then farther
02

Streaming

Streaming depends first on the region associated with the content account and target catalog, and only then on route type. Choose a streaming candidate in the relevant country or region, play real content, and observe startup, seeking, and continuous playback. If the homepage opens but playback fails, recheck the account region and content rights rather than attributing every issue to the route.

Region first
03

AI Tools

When using tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, keep the egress region stable within the same session whenever possible. Frequent region changes can repeatedly affect login status, regional detection, and the session connection. After finding a route that consistently supports login, conversations, file uploads, and long responses, keep that egress for the current task instead of selecting a new route before every request.

Session stability
04

Online gaming

Gaming places more emphasis on perceived jitter, packet loss, and routing consistency. Choose an egress based on the game server’s region, then observe input response in an actual match. Web speed tests do not fully reflect game paths, and a short result cannot represent an entire match. If a nearby direct route fluctuates noticeably, try a relay in the same region; for cross-region matchmaking, expect the effects of physical distance.

Test in a live match
05

Remote work

Remote work often involves meetings, documents, code repositories, enterprise login, and file synchronization, so route selection should favor continuity. Confirm where the company service is located, then choose the corresponding egress. For long-lived connections, test an IEPL dedicated line or a stable relay route first. If an enterprise application requires a fixed region, avoid changing egress frequently during work.

Continuous connection
SELECTION METHOD

The order for evaluating server selection

Route performance changes with the local network, target service, and time of use. Following a consistent evaluation order reduces aimless switching and makes it easier to identify whether an issue comes from the entry point, egress, or application.

Target region

Confirm the service location first

First identify the region of the target website, content catalog, enterprise system, or game server. When specific regional content is required, choose an egress in that region; for general browsing, start with a nearby Asia-Pacific route. If the target location is unclear, use a familiar service for a basic access test before deciding whether a different region is needed.

Compare within the same region

Then compare route types

Compare direct, relay, and IEPL dedicated routes within one region before switching repeatedly between countries. Keep the test consistent—for example, open the same page, play the same content, or perform the same file operation—to avoid mistaking changes in the target service for route differences.

Complete task

Observe sustained performance

Route selection is not only about whether a connection succeeds. For browsing, check continuous loading; for streaming, startup and seeking; for AI Tools, long sessions; and for work, meetings and file synchronization. Keep a route after completing a real task rather than relying on a single test result.

Keep a backup

Prepare an alternative in the same region

Once a regular route is established, keep a backup in the same region with a different access method. If the primary route temporarily fluctuates, switch to the regional backup first. This limits changes to the egress region and helps determine whether the issue is specific to one route or to the target service itself.

COVERAGE

How to understand global coverage

ZVVPN covers 120+ countries / 170+ routes. Coverage numbers describe the available range of egress locations, but the count alone is not the final criterion for every use case. For most everyday tasks, maintaining a small set of familiar regions and backup routes is more efficient than cycling through the full list.

Route maintenance may involve changes to entry points, replacement egresses, or access methods. Use the current route names and available options in the client as the basis for selection; this directory mainly explains regional distribution and route-selection logic. If an application cannot be accessed, first test an alternative in the same region, then check the application account region, system proxy, and DNS settings.

Japan · Tokyo United States · Los Angeles Singapore · Singapore Hong Kong, China · Hong Kong Switzerland · Zurich France · Paris United Kingdom · London Germany · Frankfurt Canada · Vancouver Australia · Sydney United Arab Emirates · Dubai Brazil · São Paulo

Enter the client from the route directory

Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Linux clients are available through the user panel. After signing in, obtain a subscription and view the currently available routes. No email address is required; create an account with a username and password.

Start Free